Monday, June 28, 2004

America Was Safer With Saddam Hussein in Power!

America's powerful military is unable to control the religious insurgent wackos in Iraq. How did Saddam keep them under control?

Saddam Hussein didn't have the same limitations placed on the American military - he could torture and kill innocent people to force them to spill the beans on the locations and operations of the religious nuts. Then, he could tame the religious nuts.

So, apparently, only a ruthless dictator can tame the religious wacko terrorists in Iraq.

Does anybody know where we can find a ruthless dictator type to get the religious terrorists in Iraq under control?

Hmmmmm.... Perhaps we should apologize to Saddam Hussein and ask him to take control in Iraq and tame the religious terrorists since we seem unable to do so.

Perhaps we should recognize and admit the world was safer when Saddam Hussein was keeping the religious terrorists under control in Iraq.

No matter how you look at it, what we did in Iraq under the Bush regime was the worst possible thing to do. It made America and the world LESS SAFE, and it destroyed America's image and credibility in the world. Osama Bin-Laden is the one who attacked America on 9/11 and he is still running free. Afghanistan is still a mess and seems to be getting worse every day. How much better it would have been to put 135,000 troops in Afghanistan looking for Bin-Laden and stabilizing that country before sending them to Iraq. Even people who believe attacking Iraq was a good idea must admit that we should have cleaned up Afghanistan first.

I am ashamed that Bush is president of my country. I'm ashamed that I voted for him in 2000.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home